|The maps show Pacific Railway Station station in 1998 and now.|
The maps show how the current layout of the Pacific Railway Station compares to how it was in 1998.
Overall, the station has undergone significant alteration in order to accommodate more trains and passengers.
The station only had four platforms in 1998, and they all terminated in the south at a dead end. The ticket office was located in the southeast corner of the platforms, and there was also a shop and a café nearby to facilitate travellers. The station had restrooms nearby, to the west of the platform and not too far from these structures.
The station currently has three extra platforms toward the west than it had in 1998. These three are segregated from the other four by two stores and a dining establishment. To the south of the restaurant are the stores. Nearby is a supermarket there, which is another brand-new enterprise, on the southwest corner. The cafe and the ticket office are on the opposite side of it. The size of the ticket office is visible expanding toward the west, taking over the space where the shop had been located, whereas the café maintains its 1998 appearance.
|The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is by providing free public transport 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?|
Some contend that the best way to combat traffic congestion is to always provide free bus and rail passes to everyone who needs them. While I acknowledge it may work for the vast majority of individuals, I think the government ought to offer other options to address this issue.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist to improve traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.
However for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.
In conclusion, it is undeniably true that providing free public transit to citizens may be a significant element in reducing traffic, but this is by no means the main component that governments should take into account when trying to address this issue.
- Traffic flow (n): luồng giao thông
- Traffic bottleneck (n): điểm nghẽn giao thông
- Incentive (n): sự khuyến khích
Hãy note lại những từ vựng, cấu trúc hay để làm nền tảng cho các bài viết sau nhé. Chúc các bạn học tốt! Và nếu đang gặp khó khăn khi luyện thi IELTS thì đừng ngại liên hệ với Vietop để được tư vấn chi tiết hoặc tham khảo khóa học luyện thi IELTS cấp tốc, IELTS 1 kèm 1, học IELTS online, …