The table details the international tourist arrivals in millions in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes (in percentages).
The given table compares the volume of travellers who visited eight states in two years, 2009 and 2010.
In general, tourism increased marginally in the US, Spain, the UK, and Italy while skyrocketing considerably in Turkey, China, and Germany. In addition, numbers decreased in Hong Kong while remaining flat in France, the country with the most visitors overall.
Starting with France, the statistics were constant at 76 million visitors in both years. From 66 to 67 million people, the United States saw a growth of 1.5%, while Spain saw a similar pattern (55 to 56 million tourists). The UK experienced double that pace (3.6%) of growth in tourists in 2010 and surpassed Spain by 1 million travellers. The slower 2.3% growth rate in Italy resulted in an increase to 45 million people. Furthermore, Turkey surpassed Italy with a one-third increase to 46 million.
Moving to the remaining countries, China had a gain of 55% from 22 to 34 million people, while Germany witnessed an enormous increase of twice the original number to 24 million people. The lowest figures were in Hong Kong, where tourism declined by a tenth to a final total of 9 million.
As transport and accommodation problems are increasing in many cities, some governments encourage businesses to move to rural areas. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
As transportation and housing issues worsen in many cities, some governments encourage firms to relocate to rural regions. During the course of this essay, I would analyse the given proposal objectively before drawing on a rational conclusion.
Obviously, the mentioned relocation would have undoubtedly many advantages for businesses and society as a whole. First off, decreasing prices for resources like electricity, water, and other commodities could reduce operating costs. Additionally, governments offer significant advantages to organisations who are prepared to locate their facilities in villages or towns, such as tax exemptions and better value property. As an outcome, businesses can generate substantial profits, which eventually would strengthen the nation’s economy. Additionally, this gives locals employment possibilities, preventing employees from moving to cities in search of employment. By doing so, the issues existing in metropolitans would be indirectly solved. To be specific, Positive effects on urban areas include the resolution of concerns with housing, transportation congestion, and pollution due to the possible low population density.
On the other hand, nothing is free from drawbacks. The large-scale moving of businesses should not be one without potential flaws. To commence, it would be challenging to hire skilled employees with a sufficient level of expertise, which might cause the process to stall. Employers, in particular, would face an additional burden of training inexperienced workers, which could be a consequence of moving to an area with a low background of education. On top of that, modern businesses and industries rely heavily on the availability of the supply chain; thus, a lack of facilities and services makes it even more problematic for firms to set up their infrastructure.
To conclude, despite certain difficulties, governments should endeavour to relocate enterprises to villages or towns since it would benefit both the public and commercial firms.
- Commodity (n): hàng hóa, dịch vụ thiết yếu
- Tax exemption (n): miễn giảm thuế
- Potential (adj): tiềm ẩn
- Level of expertise (n): năng lực chuyên môn
- Supply chain (n): chuỗi cung ứng
- Endeavour (v): nỗ lực hết sức